Under a bimetallic standard, a unit of
money, such as a dollar, is defined in
terms of two metals, usually gold and silver.
The United States started out on a
bimetallic standard that defined a dollar
as equal to either 371.25 grains of silver
or 24.75 grains of gold, fixing the relative
value of silver to gold at 15 to 1. Bimetallic
monetary standards date to the ancient
world, and after the 12th century, they are
well documented in European history.
The use of two metals instead of one
appeared as a reasonable means of supplementing
money supplies.
A bimetallic monetary standard owes
its complexity to the relationship
between the price of metals fixed at a
mint and the freely fluctuating market
price of metals. A bimetallic system
functions smoothly in the rare instance
in which the market price and the mint
price remain equal.
The true nature of a bimetallic standard
is best examined when mint prices
and market prices vary. If the mint ratio
of silver to gold is 15 to 1, and the free
market ratio is 16 to 1, citizens have an
incentive to take silver to the mint for
coinage, convert the silver coins into
gold coins, and exchange the gold coins
for a larger amount of silver on the free
market. According to the theory of
bimetallism, the actions of the mint in
buying silver will lift the value of silver
in the free market, reducing from
16 units to 15 units the amount of silver
equal to a unit of gold in the free market.
In 19th-century Genoa and Florence, a
bimetallic system appeared to work
according to the theory that market
prices will gravitate toward mint prices.
Subsequent experience suggested
that bimetallic systems do not work as
the bimetallic theory suggested.
Between 1792 and 1834 in the United
States, the mint ratio of silver to gold
was 15 to 1, while the free market ratio
was 15.5 to 1. This discrepancy between
mint prices and market prices led to the
disappearance of gold from circulation,
because no one had an incentive to take
gold to the mint for coinage. Valued in
silver, gold was worth more on the open
market than at the mint. When Congress
tried to remedy the situation by boosting
the mint ratio to 16 to 1, above the free
market ratio of 15.5 to 1, gold replaced
silver as circulating money. Gold rather
than silver was taken to the mint for
coinage, and the United States began
moving toward a gold standard. Under a
bimetallic system, experience taught
that the metal overvalued at the mint,
compared to the free market, tended to
drive the other metal out of circulation
as predicted by Gresham’s Law.
The last half of the 19th century saw a
vigorous rivalry develop between bimetallism
and the gold standard. The United
States and France were the strongest supporters
of bimetallism, and the United
Kingdom championed the cause of the
gold standard. The difficulties of keeping
mint prices and market prices in line
were a severe drawback to bimetallic
standards, and the major trading partners
of the world turned to the gold standard
toward the end of the century.