The currency–deposit ratio equals the
total circulating currency divided by
checkable bank deposits. Checkable
bank deposits are deposits that are used
in transactions. Also called “demand
deposits,” checkable deposits represent
claims on currency that the public can
exercise freely and with minimal delay.
The total circulating currency counts
only currency held by the nonbank public.
It excludes currency held as vault
cash at banks. Both currency and checkable
deposits act as a form of money.
The currency–deposit ratio reflects
public preferences for holding currency
relative to bank deposits. It undergoes
some seasonal variation. During the
Christmas shopping season, the ratio
tends to rise as the public carries more
currency. The public can raise the currency–
deposit ratio by withdrawing currency
from banks, and it can reduce the
currency–deposit ratio by depositing
currency in bank accounts.
The currency–deposit ratio is important
because currency is part of what economists
call “high-powered money.” Highpowered
money includes circulating
currency and bank reserves. It is called
high-powered money because a banking
system expands deposits by some multiple
of bank reserves. Bank reserves are either
vault cash or commercial bank deposits
with Federal Reserve Banks. Since circulating
currency deposited in a bank
account becomes part of bank reserves,
banks can expand bank deposits by some
multiple of the amount of a new deposit of currency. When bank lending multiplies
bank deposits, the money stock expands
accordingly. A mass withdrawal of currency
from banks will cause a contraction
in bank deposits several times greater than
the amount of currency withdrawn.
A sudden shift in the public’s preferences
for holding currency as opposed to bank
deposits can induce a change in the money
stock independent of actions by official
monetary authorities. During the early
1930s, the United States saw the public suddenly
increase its preference for currency
over deposits (Boughton and Wicker, 1979).
The public was reacting to a large increase
in the numbers of bank failures. At the
beginning of the 1930s, the United States
had not established deposit insurance, and
when a bank failed, depositors lost their
money. An outbreak of bank failures
persuaded many people that they would
rather keep their money stashed in mattresses
or buried in coffee cans.
The mass withdrawal of currency from banks not only
added to the number of bank failures but
also caused the money stock to contract.
When an economy is sinking into recession
or depression, it needs an increase in the
money stock to stem the tide of economic
retrenchment. To regain depositor confidence,
banks started holding larger reserves
relative deposits, further reducing the
amount of bank lending. Between depositors
withdrawing currency from banks, and
banks trying to bolster reserve holdings, the
money stock contracted significantly even
though the Federal Reserve increased the
amount of high-powered money. To ease the
crisis, the United States government established
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
By mid-1934, 97 percent of all
commercial bank deposits were protected by
deposit insurance (McCallum, 329). Bank
failures subsided, and the currency–deposit
ratio began a steady decline.