The “Fisher effect” refers to the tendency
for the nominal interest rate and
the inflation rate to march in step with
each other. The nominal interest rate is
the quoted market rate and is not adjusted
for inflation. The linkage between the
nominal interest rate and the inflation
rate is one-to-one. A 1-percent increase
in the inflation rate causes a 1-percent
increase in the nominal interest rate. The
relationship gets its name from Irving
Fisher, an influential U.S. economist of
the early 20th century.
Fisher developed his hypothesis to
solve what was called “Gibson’s paradox,”
a positive correlation between
interest rates and the price level that was
highly evident during the period of the
classical gold standard. John Maynard
Keynes named this correlation
“Gibson’s paradox” and called it one of
the most completely established empirical
facts in quantitative economics. It
was considered a paradox because there
was no reason for it to exist in theory.
Irving Fisher pointed out that although
there was no reason for a positive correlation
between the nominal interest rate
and the price level, there was strong reason
for positive correlation between
nominal interest rate and the rate of
change in the price level, meaning the
inflation rate.
Fisher also observed that a
weighted moving average inflation, with
recent inflation rates having larger
weights, correlated highly with the price
level. Fisher concluded that in Gibson’s
paradox the price level in effect acted as
a proxy for weighted moving average of
the inflation rate. In summary, inflation
raises nominal interest rates, but not
immediately. Over time, however, a
steady and fully anticipated inflation
rate is eventually fully reflected in
nominal interest rates.
Fisher developed an equation that
became the basis of his theory:
nominal interest rate =
real interest rate + expected inflation
According to this equation, in a zeroinflationeconomy,
thenominalinterest rate
equals the real interest rate. The real interest
rate is determined by the productivity of
capital and the thriftiness of savers. The
productivity of capital creates a demand
for lendable funds, the thriftiness of savers
creates a supply of lendable funds, and the
real interest rate adjusts to keep the two in
balance. Inflation enters the picture on both
thedemandsideandthe supply side.Onthe
demand side, inflation creates an incentive
tobeatinflationbyborrowingfundsandbuying
capital goods before prices rise. Borrowers
are willing to pay a higher interest
rate because borrowing funds allows them
to buy before prices go up. On the supply
side, inflation means that money used to
repay a loan has less purchasingpowerthan
the money that was loaned out. Therefore,
lenders must demand a higher rate of interest
to compensate for inflation. In an inflationary
economy, lenders demand a higher
interest rate, and borrowers have an incentivetopayahigherinterest.
Tokeepthesupply
and demand for lendable funds in
balance the nominal interest rates has to
change on a one-to-one basis with the
expected inflation rate.
The Fisher effect is highly evident in
short-term interest rates, such as those
earned by three-month treasury bonds. For
short-term interest rates, the actual inflation
rate acts as a reasonable proxy for the
expected rate of inflation. For longer-term
interest rates, the Fisher effect becomes
difficult to test because expected inflation
is not subject to direct measurement.