The term “hot money” in an economic or
financial context refers to money that
quickly shifts between financial markets in
search of the highest short-term interest
rate or rate of return. “Hot money
investors” are investors who jump into and
out of short-term investments, sometimes
driven to act in mass by a seemingly herd
mentality. The term does crop up in criminal
investigations where it refers to marked
bills or new currency with consecutive
serial numbers. Such currency bears the
name “hot money” because it can be easily
identified and linked to a specific crime.
In today’s world of globalization and
financial liberalization, the term “hot
money” in the popular media usually
refers to the use of the term in an economic
or financial context. Even from
the economic and financial perspective,
“hot money” can carry different shades
of meaning. Banks often think of
deposits from foreign and institutional
investors as being hot money because
these deposits are large and may be suddenly
and unexpectedly withdrawn.
Questions about a bank’s solvency or
higher interest rates in other places can
cause a mass exodus of these deposits.
To a buffer against the volatility of hot
money, banks may cultivate a large base
of consumer and household deposits.
As trading strategies of investors and
speculators have grown in complexity,
the influence of hot money has been felt
in markets normally outside the sphere
of risky speculation. In 2006, observers
expressed concern about the influx of hot
money in to the U.S. municipal bond
market, one of the drabber and quieter
financial markets (Pollock, 2006). Usually
investors in these bonds are U.S.
investors because the interest rate paid
by these bonds, although lower that the
interest rate paid on other bonds, is
exempt from federal taxation. Foreign
investors began investing in these bonds
after they found a way to place leveraged
bets on a divergence between the prices
of municipal bonds and non–tax-exempt
bonds. Some investors feared that than a
mass exodus of foreign investors would
cause the market for these bonds to
plummet.
In 2005, some analysts and investors
saw hot money behind a large run up of
oil prices and the greater volatility in oil
prices (Sesit and Reilly, 2005). They
blamed hedge funds making use of large
computer programs, organizations that
unlike airlines and utilities had no direct
need to purchase oil.
Hot money is often cited as a disruptive
factor in international capital flows,
allowing sudden shifts that can spark contagious
financial crises. In 2008, Chinese
officials expressed concern about the
excess inflow of hot money (McMahon,
2008). Foreign investors depositing
money in China gained in two fronts.
First, Chinese interest rates stood nearly
twice U.S. levels. Secondly, between January
and May of 2008, Chinese currency
gained in value 4.2 percent relative to the
U.S. dollar. Observers had credited hot
money for drastic fluctuations in China’s
booming stock market and real estate market. Unlike many countries, China
has strict controls on foreign capital
movements that should restrain inflows
and outflows of hot money, but foreign
investors have found ways to get around
the controls. One way of getting around
the controls involves inflating receipts of
legitimate trade and investment transactions.
Chinese officials have no way of
knowing exactly how much hot money
has entered China. China’s case is interesting
in that it shows that controlling
movements of hot money can be difficult.