Money laundering refers to the processes
of turning money earned from criminal
activity into untainted, innocent money
that bears no traces of its illegitimate origin.
Laundering money hides untaxed and
otherwise illegitimate income from tax
collectors and law enforcement. It transforms
the profits from crime into legitimate
investments. More recently, the term
has been applied to money secretly channeled
into financing terrorist activity.
Money laundering makes it more difficult
to trace the origin of terrorist activity.
The age of computer networking and
liberalized capital flows opened new
opportunities for money launderers. As
late as 1989, Columbian police, after
shooting dead a Columbian drug lord, unearthed his stash of millions of dollars.
He had buried it because sneaking it into
the financial system unnoticed was too
difficult (Economist, July 1997). According
to some experts, now it is much easier.
Rapid growth in the number of cross-border
transfers played into the hands of those
needing to hide ill-gotten gain. In addition,
the multiplication of sophisticated financial
instruments has aided and abetted the
work of money launderers. On one case,
money launders fabricated a profitable
options trade to account for the sudden
appearance of a hefty sum of cash in a
bank account. Russian crime-lords have
gone so far as to buy a whole bank.
Money laundering is service that can
be purchased by those who know where
to look. By one estimate, the going rate
for cleansing drug money is Britain is
between 5 and 10 percent (Economist,
May 2006). Britain has some of the
world’s toughest laws against money
laundering.
About three quarters of laundered
money probably originates from the
profits of illicit trade. Estimates of the
total amount of criminal money cleansed
through the global financial system
ranges as high as $1.5 trillion per year
(Economist, April 2001). The total
amount of criminal money in the global
financial system could easily run into the
trillions. Some even suspect that flows of
criminal money inflate and deflate financial
markets. In the 1990s, both Mexico
and Thailand underwent currency crises.
Although economic mismanagement
existed in each case, it was also true that
both countries were centers for money
laundering.
Aside from criminals themselves, the
main culprits in money laundering are the
off-shore banks, particularly the “shell”
or “brass-plate” banks. The shell or
brass-plate banks have no physical presence
in any location. In one case, U.S.
investigators discovered that illegal drug
money has been wired to a bank account
outside the United States. After getting
the government in the bank’s country to
assist in the investigation, investigators
discovered that the bank and bank
account to which the money was wired
actually resided in another country. Officials
in this last country discovered that
the bank had no buildings or branches. It
turned out the shell bank had an account
in a correspondent bank in New York.
That was where the money was found.
In 1986, the United States enacted the
Money Laundering Control Act, the
world’s first law specifically directed
against money laundering. As the War on
Terror became a major concern after
September 11, 2001, the United States
strengthened its stance against money
laundering, levying heavy fines against
offending banks. In both the United
States and Britain, banks are obligated to
report suspicious transactions. The problem
of money laundering resembles the
problem of global warming in that effective
action requires cooperation of all
countries.
So far, an international consensus
has not emerged on what bans
should exist on money laundering. Some
remember the experience of Jews in Germany
who violated capital controls to
get money out of Germany and into
Swiss bank accounts. Bans on money
laundering could interfere with the legitimate
needs of oppressed people to move
assets to a safe haven.