The velocity of money is the average
number of times per year that a unit of
currency (e.g., U.S. dollar, Japanese yen,
German mark) is spent on goods and
services. From a theoretical perspective,
a percentage change in the velocity of
money can have the same impact on
prices or other economic variables as an
equivalent percentage change in the
money supply.
Sir William Petty (1623–1687) may
have been the first writer on economics
to describe the velocity of money.
He advanced the plausible view that the
velocity of money was determined by
the frequency of people’s pay periods.
The famous philosopher John Locke
(1632–1704) wrote on monetary economics
and referred to the ratio of a country’s
money stock to its trade, a concept
bearing a marked resemblance to velocity.
By the mid-20th century, the concept of
velocity was a cornerstone of monetary
economics, which is the study of the relationship
between the money supply and
prices, interest rates, and output.
A measure of velocity can be
calculated by dividing a measure of a
nation’s output (i.e., gross domestic
product, or GDP) by a measure of the
money supply. Between 1945 and
1981, one measure of velocity varied
between two and seven. The stability of
velocity, its tendency to fluctuate in a
narrow range, remains one of the
important theoretical questions in monetary
economics.
Under conditions of hyperinflation,
money loses its value quickly and people
try to spend it faster. During the classic
case of the German hyperinflation after
World War I, workers were paid at halfday
intervals and took off work to spend
their wages before they lost their value.
These are the conditions that set velocity
soaring, further feeding the inflationary
momentum that begins with excess
money supplies.
A depression economy, particularly
when coupled with falling prices, may
lead households and businesses to
hoard money because they are afraid
that stocks and bonds are unsafe
investments and perhaps because they
hope to capture the benefits of falling
prices. These conditions produce
declining velocity, having the same
effect as declining money supplies,
sending the economy into a steeper
descent.
Many modern economists argue that
if the government stabilizes the money
supply growth rate at a modest rate, perhaps
3 to 5 percent annually, velocity
will also stabilize, and the growth path of
the economy will mirror the stability in
the monetary growth rate.